deciding what to have for dinner.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
– Benjamin Franklin –

I firmly believe that all Americans should thoroughly study and review often their American history.
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
-George Santayana
The formation of the United States as a constitutional democratic republic is not well understood by many citizens. I am not sure how schools are teaching these government and civics classes today. However, when I was a young student, I remember my teachers expressing a reverence for personal liberty and what it meant to be free. We were always told that "freedom was not free" and many brave people had fought for our freedoms and 'we' might have to fight again. Our freedom was in part due to their convictions and sacrifice and we should never forget. Also, I was taught that civil liberties and civil rights are precious and must always be protected from any who might try to infringe them. The United States was the beacon for personal liberties and the only place to make the 'American dream' possible.
Among many things, one thing that really annoys me is how some propagandists try to demonize judges for doing their job and playing their role in the constitutional process of checks and balances. The term 'activist judge' and playing on the general publics ignorance by questioning how a judge can reverse a voter initiative. Well, judges have had to rule certain voter initiatives un-constitutional many times before.
Courts often need to step in to protect the lambs from the wolves.

Now that we all remember why judges must check that laws meet constitutional standards.
Here is a good article to detail
Judge Walkers Ruling
And, here is another...
SF Chron Editorial
Walker's ruling on Prop. 8 stay is the right one
If you read the readers' comments associated with this article you will see some real ignorance of the constitutional process, and/or individuals taking advantage of others' ignorance of due process.
Confusion
As I mentioned above, there seems to be a lot of confusion amongst the general citizenry as to how the judicial review process works for a voter initiative like Prop. 8. Some commentators are clearly taking advantage of that confusion and ignorance to fan the flames of anger of the voters who feel their will is not being recognized. Anyone who wants to research further can investigate the "Equal Protection" clauses in both the federal and state constitutions. To amend these clauses would take a fundamental change or revision to the constitution, which can only be originated in the legislature and takes more that a simple majority to enact.
See this article for the letter of the law.
http://trustreagan.com/2008/11/20/amendment-vs-revision-the-impact-on-prop-8/
In the meantime, same sex couples, who have the constitutional right to marry which has been affirmed and re-affirmed by both state and federal courts, are being forced to have their civil rights put on hold.
Same Sex Partners Must Wait Longer...
Civil Rights Put on Hold?!
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/08/16/BAEE1EUOIF.DTL
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/08/16/national/a120233D02.DTL&feed=rss.news_nation







